Time to Mobility Is Associated With Pulmonary Complications in Patients With Spine Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of spine fractures may require periods of prolonged immobilization which prevents effective pulmonary toileting. We hypothesized that patients with longer time to mobilization, as measured by time to first physical therapy (PT) session, would have higher pulmonary complications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all trauma patients with cervical and thoracolumbar spinal fractures admitted to a level 1 trauma center over a 12-month period. Demographic data collection included age, gender, BMI, pulmonary comorbidities, concomitant rib fractures, admission GCS, Injury Severity Score (ISS), GCS at 24 h, treatment with cervical or thoracolumbar immobilization, and time to first PT evaluation. The primary outcome was the presence of any one of the following complications: unplanned intubation, pneumonia, or mortality at 30 days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess significant predictors of pulmonary complication. RESULTS: In total, 491 patients were identified. In terms of overall pulmonary complications, 10% developed pneumonia, 13% had unplanned intubation, and 6% died within 30 days. In total, 19% developed one or more complication. Overall, 25% of patients were seen by PT <48 h, 33% between 48 and 96 h, 19% at 96 h to 1 week, and 7% > 1 week. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that time to PT session (OR 1.010, 95% CI 1.005-1.016) and ISS (OR 1.063, 95% CI 1.026-1.102) were independently associated with pulmonary complication. CONCLUSION: Time to mobility is independently associated with pulmonary complications in patients with spine fractures.

Deep Learning-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Thoracolumbar Fracture Features on Lateral Radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm for the quantitative measurement of thoracolumbar (TL) fracture features, and to evaluate its efficacy across varying levels of clinical expertise. METHODS: Using the pretrained Mask Region-Based Convolutional Neural Networks model, originally developed for vertebral body segmentation and fracture detection, we fine-tuned the model and added a new module for measuring fracture metrics-compression rate (CR), Cobb angle (CA), Gardner angle (GA), and sagittal index (SI)-from lumbar spine lateral radiographs. These metrics were derived from six-point labeling by 3 radiologists, forming the ground truth (GT). Training utilized 1,000 nonfractured and 318 fractured radiographs, while validations employed 213 internal and 200 external fractured radiographs. The accuracy of the DL algorithm in quantifying fracture features was evaluated against GT using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Additionally, 4 readers with varying expertise levels, including trainees and an attending spine surgeon, performed measurements with and without DL assistance, and their results were compared to GT and the DL model. RESULTS: The DL algorithm demonstrated good to excellent agreement with GT for CR, CA, GA, and SI in both internal (0.860, 0.944, 0.932, and 0.779, respectively) and external (0.836, 0.940, 0.916, and 0.815, respectively) validations. DL-assisted measurements significantly improved most measurement values, particularly for trainees. CONCLUSION: The DL algorithm was validated as an accurate tool for quantifying TL fracture features using radiographs. DL-assisted measurement is expected to expedite the diagnostic process and enhance reliability, particularly benefiting less experienced clinicians.

Acute Translation Fracture of the Lumbar Spine With Increased Motoric Outcomes: A Case Report.

Translation fracture of the lumbar spine is a rare but serious condition that necessitates prompt medical attention. This injury can cause nerve damage, spinal cord compression, and other complications that can affect motor function. The motoric outcomes of this fracture type depend on a variety of factors, including the severity and location of the fracture, the age and general health of the patient, and the timeliness and effectiveness of treatment. Accurate diagnosis and treatment of these injuries is important to prevent further neurological damage and improve motoric outcomes. Here we present the case of a male patient with a translation fracture at the L1-L2 level with AO spine type C who underwent immediate realignment and posterior stabilization, and subsequently participated in an early rehabilitation program, resulting in improved neurologic function. Thoracolumbar fracture with lateral dislocation is very rare and significant experience is needed to determine which management strategy can ensure the best outcome.

Delayed Unilateral Facet Interlocking After a Stable Superior Articular Process Fracture of the Cervical Spine: A Case Report.

A 42-year-old man presented with neck pain after a fall from a tree. Spine computed tomography (CT) illustrated the right C5 superior articular process fracture without displacement. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the fracture and injury of the posterior ligament complex. Initially he was managed conservatively with a neck brace as there were no signs of instability or vertebral body misalignment. However, three days after discharge, right shoulder weakness and numbness of the right upper arm became prominent. X-rays and CT showed anterior slippage of the C4 vertebral body and locked C4/5 facet ??a fractured bony fragment of the C5 superior articular process was pushed forward by the locked inferior articular process of C4 and invaded the neural foramen. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was performed using allograft and plate/screws fixation. Although initial imaging showed no evidence of subluxation, surgeons should be aware of occult instability and the possibility of delayed dislocation associated with the unilateral cervical facet fracture.

Epidemiology of Cervical Spine Injuries Requiring Surgical Treatment in Plovdiv and Plovdiv Region, Bulgaria.

Objective: Cervical spine injuries (CSI) are associated with high rates of permanent disability and mortality, which increase the socioeconomic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. We aimed to investigate the epidemiology of CSI, frequency of operative treatment, and incidence of associated neurological deficits at regional level. Methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric study of patients with sustained CSI from January 2017 to December 2021, carried out only in a first-level trauma center in the Plovdiv metro region. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data from the medical records were thoroughly analyzed. Based on the assumption that all patients with CSI were hospitalized in single trauma center, the percentage of cases indicated for surgical treatment was calculated based on the population of the entire Plovdiv metro area. Results: One hundred forty-nine patients permanently residing in the Plovdiv metro region were included in this study. Of the 149 patients, 97 (65.1%) were surgically treated and 61 (62.9%) were over 60 years of age. The frequency of operative interventions for CSI was 2.9/100,000 patients. Annually, 10.6 people from the Plovdiv metro region suffer from neurological deficits as a result of neck injuries (1.6/100,000 residents). The number of patients with complete spinal cord injury in the surgically treated group was 11 (11.3%); that is, the regional frequency was 2.2 people per year. Conclusion: In the Plovdiv metro region, a significant annual frequency of neurological deficits requiring surgical intervention for CSI has been established, especially in patients aged >60 years.

Comparative surgical outcomes of navigated vs non-navigated posterior spinal fusions in ankylosing spondylitis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients with acute spinal fractures represent a challenge for practicing spine surgeons due to difficult operative anatomy and susceptibility to complications. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does intraoperative CT-navigation improve outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing surgery? METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out at our centre from 05/2016-06/2021 to identify AS patients presenting with a traumatic spinal fracture, managed surgically with posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Cohorts were categorised and compared for outcomes based on those who underwent PSF with intraoperative CT-navigation versus those surgically managed with traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy. RESULTS: 37 AS patients were identified. 29/37 (78.4%) underwent PSF. Intraoperative navigation was used in 14 (48.3%) cases. Mean age of the entire cohort was 67.6 years. No difference existed between the navigated and non-navigated groups for mean levels fused (5.35 vs 5.07; p â€‹= â€‹0.31), length of operation (217.9mins vs 175.3mins; p â€‹= â€‹0.07), overall length-of-stay (12 days vs 21.9 days; p â€‹= â€‹0.16), patients requiring HDU (3/14 vs 5/15; p â€‹= â€‹0.09) or ICU (5/14 vs 9/15; p â€‹= â€‹0.10), postoperative neurological improvement (1/14 vs 1/15; p â€‹= â€‹0.48) or deterioration (1/14 vs 0/15; p â€‹= â€‹0.15), intraoperative complications (2/14 vs 3/15; p â€‹= â€‹0.34), postoperative complications 4/14 vs 4/15; p â€‹= â€‹0.46), revision surgeries (3/14 vs 1/15; p â€‹= â€‹0.16) and 30-day mortality (0/14 vs 0/15). CONCLUSION: This is the first study that compares surgical outcomes of navigated vs non-navigated PSFs for AS patients with an acute spinal fracture. Although limited by its retrospective design and sample size, this study highlights the non-inferiority of intraoperative navigation as a surgical aid in a challenging cohort.

Percutaneous Pedicle Screw for Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Long-term Follow-up.

Objective: This is a retrospective cohort study to analyze the long-term outcomes of thoracolumbar spine fracture patients who underwent minimally invasive percutaneous fixation. Methods: The cases of 17 patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures who had percutaneous fixation between 2009 and 2011 were the subject of a retrospective analysis. Clinical and radiographic variables were collected. For the clinical evaluation the questionnaires SF-36 and Oswestry were used. Radiographic parameters were evaluated using fracture's classification based on Magerls's criteria, the fractured vertebra's wedging angle, and the affected segment's segmental Cobb angle. The measures were made at different stages: before surgery, immediately after surgery, one year later, and at a late follow-up (5 years later). Trauma associated injuries, post-surgical and implant related complications were among the additional information taken into account. Results: The SF-36 questionnaire showed averages above 63,5% in all domains in the late postoperative data (from 5 years after the surgery). Oswestry questionnaire answers showed minimal or no physical limitations in 80% of the patients with a mean score of 10,8%±10,5. The average preoperative Cobb angle value was 5,53° ± 13,80° of kyphosis, the immediate postoperative 2,18° ± 13,38° of kyphosis, one year postoperative 5,26 ± 13,95° of kyphosis, and the late follow-up 8,78° ± 15,06° of kyphosis. The mean correction was 3,35°, and mean loss of correction was 6,6°. There were no complications observed, no case of neurological deficit, infection or implant failure occurred. Conclusion: Thoracolumbar vertebrae fractures can be surgically treated with positive late clinical and radiological outcomes and low complication rates using a minimally invasive percutaneous method.

The choice of classification to determine the optimal tactics for treatment of the thoracolumbar junction traumatic injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To evaluate the influence of the degree of detail of the nature of the pathomorphological changes in the osteoligamentous structures on the tactics of treating the patients with the traumatic damage to the thoracolumbar junction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the treatment tactics was carried out in 96 patients with a traumatic injury of the thoracolumbar junction, both those who underwent a surgical treatment and those who underwent a conservative therapy. The lesions were classified using F. Magerl and AOSpine classifications; the neurological status was assessed according to the ASIA scale, the nature of the damage was specified using the McCormack criteria. The statistical data processing was performed using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm. RESULTS: Results: The nature of the injury makes it possible to unambiguously determine the optimal method of therapy when using the F. Magerl classification with a probability of 58.33%, while in relation to the AOSpine classification this figure is 55.21%. When building the models that include the nature of the damage, the level of the neurological disorders and the McCormack criteria, it was found that the use of the F. Magerl classification demonstrates an error in unambiguously determining the most effective treatment method at the level of 26.04%, while the use of AOSpine this figure was 21.88%. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The application of the AOSpine classification is more promising for the development of a multifactorial algorithm for the treatment of the traumatic injuries of the thoracolumbar junction.

Towards clinical implementation of an AI-algorithm for detection of cervical spine fractures on computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) applications can facilitate detection of cervical spine fractures on CT and reduce time to diagnosis by prioritizing suspected cases. PURPOSE: To assess the effect on time to diagnose cervical spine fractures on CT and diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available AI application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study (June 2020 - March 2022) with historic controls and prospective evaluation, we evaluated regulatory-cleared AI-software to prioritize cervical spine fractures on CT. All patients underwent non-contrast CT of the cervical spine. The time between CT acquisition and the moment the scan was first opened (DNT) was compared between the retrospective and prospective cohorts. The reference standard for determining diagnostic accuracy was the radiology report created in routine clinical workflow and adjusted by a senior radiologist. Discrepant cases were reviewed and clinical relevance of missed fractures was determined. RESULTS: 2973 (mean age, 55.4 ± 19.7 [standard deviation]; 1857 men) patients were analyzed by AI, including 2036 retrospective and 938 prospective cases. Overall prevalence of cervical spine fractures was 7.6 %. The DNT was 18 % (5 min) shorter in the prospective cohort. In scans positive for cervical spine fracture according to the reference standard, DNT was 46 % (16 min) shorter in the prospective cohort. Overall sensitivity of the AI application was 89.8 % (95 % CI: 84.2-94.0 %), specificity was 95.3 % (95 % CI: 94.2-96.2 %), and diagnostic accuracy was 94.8 % (95 % CI: 93.8-95.8 %). Negative predictive value was 99.1 % (95 % CI: 98.5-99.4 %) and positive predictive value was 63.0 % (95 % CI: 58.0-67.8 %). 22 fractures were missed by AI of which 5 required stabilizing therapy. CONCLUSION: A time gain of 16 min to diagnosis for fractured cases was observed after introducing AI. Although AI-assisted workflow prioritization of cervical spine fractures on CT shows high diagnostic accuracy, clinically relevant cases were missed.

Correlations between Sagittal Parameters and Functional Scores in 65-Year-Old Osteoporotic Females with Vertebral Body Fracture under Low-Energy Mechanism.

Background: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most common fragility fractures associated with low-energy injury mechanisms in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. No clear consensus is currently available on the optimal timing for surgical intervention in specific cases. Methods: This study examined the correlations between sagittal parameters, functional scores, and the appropriate timing for surgical intervention during the recovery stage in patients with osteoporosis with thoracolumbar (TL) vertebral body fractures. A total of 161 women aged ≥ 65 years with osteoporosis were included in the study. Spinal sagittal parameters from standing plain films and functional outcomes as the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected. Results: We found that TL junction Cobb angle was significantly correlated with ODI > 30 (p < 0.001) and VAS > 6 (p < 0.001) and the discriminative values for predicting ODI > 30 and VAS > 6 were a TL kyphotic angle of 14.5° and 13.5°, respectively. Among women aged ≥ 65 years with osteoporosis, the back pain and functional impairment observed within 6 months following a compression fracture are associated with a greater TL kyphosis angle. Conclusions: This suggests that a more proactive approach may be necessary when addressing the conditions of these patients.

Anorexia Nervosa and Osteoporosis: A Possible Complication to Remember.

Anorexia nervosa (AN) belongs to the spectrum of food disorders and affects approximately 2.9 million people worldwide. It is responsible for numerous and serious medical complications. Osteoporosis is a common complication, and the decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) is one of the few potentially irreversible consequences of AN. When associated with AN, it can manifest at a very young age, possibly leading to irreparable damage. We describe the case of a 30-year-old woman with a one-year evolution diagnosis of AN, complaining of back pain. Physical examination revealed a slight elevation of the right shoulder and pain at compression of paravertebral right dorsal musculature with a palpable strained muscle. Full-length X-ray imaging of the dorsal spine revealed a slight dextroconvex dorsolumbar scoliosis. A dorsal spine computerized tomography (CT) was performed, confirming a fracture of the upper platform of the sixth dorsal vertebrae. Osteodensitometry showed lumbar spine osteoporosis and femoral osteopenia. The decrease in BMD and, later on, the development of osteoporosis can occur in both types of AN. It is a severe complication that affects up to 50% of these patients. It can be irreversible and increase the lifetime risk of bone fractures and, therefore, morbimortality. Low body weight and body mass index (BMI) strongly correlate with the decrease in BMD. Treatment of osteoporosis associated with AN is not standardized and clearly labeled. Weight gain is described as the strategy with the most impact in reversing the loss of bone mass and increasing the BMD. The regularization of gonadal function also seems to independently potentiate the increase of BMD. The occurrence of long bone and vertebrae fractures frequently results in a decrease in height and chronic back pain, culminating in greater morbimortality and healthcare costs. This clinical case aims to show theclose relationship between restrictive food disorders and the decrease of BMD and the subsequent development of osteoporosis and its complications. Although rare in young and healthy people, when associated with restrictive food disorders, it should raise a red flag in its clinical evaluation. Preventing osteoporosis development and reduction of fracture risk in this population is essential. The current absence of consistent evidence regarding screening of osteoporosis in this particular group should raise awareness and promote further larger-scale studies to establish standardized recommendations concerning not only screening but also pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in patients with AN.

What Factors Influence Surgeons in Decision-Making in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures? A Survey-Based Investigation of a Panel of Spine Surgery Experts.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors affecting decision-making in thoracolumbar burst-fractures without neurologic deficit. METHODS: A 40-question survey addressing expert-related, economic, and radiological factors was distributed to 30 international trauma experts. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the impact of these factors on operative or non-operative management preferences. RESULTS: Out of 30 experts, 27 completed the survey. The majority of respondents worked at level 1 trauma centers (81.5%) within university settings (77.8%). They were primarily orthopedic surgeons (66.7%) and had over 10 years of experience (70.4%). About 81% found distinguishing between A3 and A4 fractures relevant for decision-making. Most experts (59%) treated A3 fractures non-surgically, while only 30% treated A4 fractures conservatively. Compensation systems did not influence treatment recommendations, and hospital measures promoting surgeries did not significantly affect distribution. Radiological factors, such as local kyphosis (25/27), fracture comminution (23/27), overall sagittal balance (21/27), and spinal canal narrowing (20/27), influenced decisions. CONCLUSION: Incomplete burst fractures (A3) are predominantly treated non-surgically, while complete burst fractures (A4) are primarily treated surgically. Compensation, third-party incentives, and outpatient care did not significantly impact decision-making. Radiological factors beyond the AO Spine thoracolumbar classification system seem to be essential and warrant further evaluation.

Vertebral fracture severity assessment on anteroposterior radiographs with a new semi-quantitative technique.

We developed a new tool to assess the severity of osteoporotic vertebral fracture using radiographs of the spine. Our technique can be used in patient care by helping to stratify patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures into appropriate treatment pathways. It can also be used for research purposes. PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to propose a semi-quantitative (SQ) grading scheme for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. METHODS: On AP radiographs, the vertebrae are divided into right and left halves, which are graded (A) vertical rectangle, (B) square, (C) traverse rectangle, and (D) trapezoid; whole vertebrae are graded (E) transverse band or (F) bow-tie. Type A and B were compared with normal and Genant SQ grade 1 OVF, Type C and D with grade 2 OVF, and Type E and F with grade 3 OVF. Spine AP radiographs and lateral radiographs of 50 females were assessed by AP radiographs SQ grading. After training, an experienced board-certified radiologist and a radiology trainee assessed the 50 AP radiographs. RESULTS: The height-to-width ratio of the half vertebrae varied 1.32-1.48. On lateral radiographs, 84 vertebrae of the 50 patients had OVFs (38 grade 1, 24 grade 2, and 22 grade 3). On AP radiographs, the radiologist correctly assigned 84.2%, 91.7%, and 77.2% and the trainee correctly assigned 68.4%, 79.2%, and 81.8% of grade 1, 2, and 3 OVFs, respectively. Compared with lateral radiographs, the radiologist had a weighted Kappa of 0.944 including normal vertebrae and 0.883 not including normal vertebrae, while the corresponding Kappa values for the trainee were 0.891 and 0.830, respectively. CONCLUSION: We propose a new semi-quantitative grading system for vertebral fracture severity assessment on AP spine radiographs.

Clinical Outcome Analysis of Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Insertion in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis Complicated with Spinal Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Vague spinal anatomical landmarks in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) make intraoperative insertion of pedicle screws difficult under direct vision. Currently, the clinical outcome is significantly improved with robot guidance. This study aims to explore the efficacy of robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion in treating AS combined with spinal fractures. METHODS: Forty patients (341 screws) who underwent pedicle screw insertion with AS complicated with spinal fractures were included. According to different surgical methods, 16 patients (135 screws) were classified into the robot group and 24 (206 screws) into the free-hand group. Intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, and adverse events were compared between the 2 groups. Gertzbein and Robbins classification was used to classify the accuracy of screw position. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale, Japanese Orthopedic Association, and Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between baseline data of the groups. The difference in the blood loss between groups wasn't significant, nor was the operative duration. No severe adverse events related to pedicle screw insertion were reported in either group. Notably, the accuracy of screw insertion was significantly higher in the robot group (129/135) than in the free-hand group (182/206). The lateral perforation prevalence didn't differ among groups. Visual Analog Scale in the third month postoperatively was lower in the robot group than in the free-hand group, with a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates statistically superior accuracy and surgical outcome of robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion in the treatment of AS complicated with spinal fractures compared with the traditional free-hand operation.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Traumatic C2 Vertebral Fracture : A Literature Review.

The integrity of the high cervical spine, the transition zone from the brainstem to the spinal cord, is crucial for survival and daily life. The region protects the enclosed neurovascular structure and allows a substantial portion of the head motion. Injuries of the high cervical spine are frequent, and the fractures of the C2 vertebra account for approximately 17-25% of acute cervical fractures. We review the two major types of C2 vertebral fractures, odontoid fracture and Hangman's fracture. For both types of fractures, favorable outcomes could be obtained if the delicately selected conservative treatment is performed. In odontoid fractures, as the most common fracture on the C2 vertebrae, anterior screw fixation is considered first for type II fractures, and C1-2 fusion is suggested when nonunion is a concern or occurs. Hangman's fractures are the second most common fracture. Many stable extension type I and II fractures can be treated with external immobilization, whereas the predominant flexion type IIA and III fractures require surgical stabilization. No result proves that either anterior or posterior surgery is superior, and the surgeon should decide on the surgical method after careful consideration according to each clinical situation. This review will briefly describe the basic principles and current treatment concepts of C2 fractures.

Spinal Sagittal Imbalance is Associated with Vertebral Fracture without a Definite History of Falls: Cross-Sectional, Comparative Study of Cohort with and without a Distal Radius Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Treating osteoporosis in patients with a distal radius fracture (DRF) became paramount at the Fracture Liaison Service. Spinal sagittal imbalance emerged as a risk factor for subsequent fractures. Therefore, here we investigated the spinal profile of patients with DRF to investigate its association with a history of falls and prevalent vertebral fractures. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of 162 women presenting with DRF and 162 age-matched women without fracture who underwent an osteoporosis evaluation including bone mineral density (BMD) and lateral spine imaging. We compared the incidence of prevalent vertebral fracture and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) to measure spinal sagittal imbalance. We also performed a regression analysis of the risks of prevalent vertebral fracture, such as age, body mass index (BMI), BMD, and SVA. RESULTS: The SVA was significantly smaller (indicating more stable sagittal balance) in patients with a DRF versus controls (16 mm vs. 34 mm, respectively; p<0.001). The incidence of a prevalent vertebral fracture was similar between groups (12% vs. 15%, respectively; p=0.332). In both groups, the SVA was significantly greater in those with versus without a vertebral fracture. The vertebral fracture was significantly associated with age and SVA but not BMI or spinal BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal sagittal balance was superior in DRF patients, yet the frequency of prevalent vertebral fractures was similar. The identification of this unique spinal profile in patients with DRF may increase our understanding of osteoporotic fractures.

Demystifying the Risk Factors and Preventive Measures for Osteoporosis.

Background: Osteoporosis is a major health problem, globally. It is characterized by structural bone weakness leading to an increased risk of fragility fractures. These fractures commonly affect the spine, hip and wrist bones. Consequently, Osteoporosis related proximal femur and vertebral fractures represent a substantial, growing social and economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Indentification of the risk factors, clinical risk assessment, utilization of risk assessment tools and appropriate management that play a crucial role in reducing the burden of Osteoporosis by tackling modifiable risk factors. Methods: This chapter explores various risk factors that are associated with Osteoporosis and provides an overview of various clinical and diagnostic risk assessment tools with a particular emphasis on evidence-based strategies for their prevention. Conclusion: The role of emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and perspectives such as newer diagnostic modalities, monitoring and surveillance approaches in prevention of risk factors in the pathogenesis of Osteoporosis is highlighted.

Factors influencing vertebral collapse in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a case-control study of symptomatic patients attended in the emergency department.

This study aimed to identify risk factors for the collapse of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). We analyzed data from conventional radiography and computed tomography in patients with OVFs and found that older age and two radiological measurements were predictive for vertebral collapse. These factors can be useful for clinical practice. PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for collapse of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) on computed tomography (CT) and conventional radiography (CR). METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study including a series of patients with OVF diagnosed at the emergency department of our institution from January to September 2019. Inclusion criteria were to have standing CR and supine CT within 2 weeks after the diagnosis of OVF and a follow-up CR at 6 months or later. We evaluated different imaging measurements at the initial diagnostic examinations, including vertebral height loss, local kyphosis, vertebral density, and fracture type according to the grading systems of Genant, Sugita, Association of Osteosynthesis (AO) Spine, and the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma. Vertebral collapse was defined as loss of ≥ 50% of vertebral area or height. Cases and controls were defined as OVFs which collapse and do not collapse, respectively, on follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 72.6 ± 1.2 years, including 48 women. Twenty-five (44.6%) OVFs developed collapse on follow-up. None of the fracture classification systems were found to be predictive of collapse. Multivariate analysis showed that older age, increased density ratio (≥ 2) between the fractured and non-fractured vertebral bodies, and a ≥ 6% difference in posterior vertebral height (PVH) loss between standing CR and supine CT exhibited 88% discriminative power in predicting vertebral collapse. CONCLUSIONS: Age over 72.5 years, a density ratio ≥ 2 between the fractured and non-fractured vertebral bodies, and a difference equal to or higher than 6% in PVH loss between standing CR and supine CT, are risk factors for developing vertebral collapse after OVF.

A randomized controlled study on systematic nursing care based on health empowerment theory and its effect on the self-care and functional abilities of patients with spinal fractures.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to explore the effectiveness of systematic nursing care based on health empowerment theory on the self-care and functional abilities of patients with spinal fractures. METHODS: We selected a total of 50 patients with spinal fractures from our hospital and randomly divided them into the control group and the observation group, with 25 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received conventional nursing care, while those in the observation group received systematic nursing care grounded in the health empowerment theory. We recorded and compared the self-care ability, functional ability, knowledge about the condition, and pain scores of patients in the two groups before and after the nursing intervention. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05), and there was no significant difference in self-care ability, functional ability, knowledge about the condition, or the visual analog scale (VAS) score between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). After treatment, outcomes in the observation group in terms of self-care ability, functional ability, and knowledge about the condition were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.05), while the VAS score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional nursing care, patients with spinal fractures who received systematic nursing inputs based on health empowerment theory reported significant improvements in pain, self-care, functional ability, and knowledge of the condition, and this is an approach that is worthy of promotion in clinical use.

Vertebral compression fractures: pain relief, progression and new fracture rate comparing vertebral augmentation with brace.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is the third most frequent fragility fracture in the world. Conservative treatment, vertebroplasty, and kyphoplasty are all recognized therapies. However, diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations must be more consistent when comparing clinical guidelines. This study aims to compare the efficacy of vertebral augmentation therapy and conservative management for treating VCFs, the risk of subsequent complications, and the length of hospital stay. METHOD: All patients over 50 years old with a diagnosis of thoracic or lumbar VCF without underlying oncological process, treated conservatively or surgically, and consecutively attended at our department from January 2017 to June 2021 were retrospectively selected for analysis. Patients who missed follow-up or died during the first three months were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 573 cases were selected for analysis. Most patients were treated conservatively (85.3%). Both groups were homogenous regarding epidemiological and clinical features. The median time elapsed to achieve pain relief was significantly lower in the surgical cohort (4.5 vs. 10 weeks, p < 0.001), and the proportion of patients reporting pain at the first outpatient visit was also significantly lower with a vertebral augmentation procedure (p = 0.004). The new fracture rate and the adjacent level rate did not differ significantly when comparing both treatments, whereas the progression of the diagnosed fracture was more frequent in the conservative group (4.8% vs. 29.7%; p < 0.001). The median hospital stay was significantly lower in the conservative group (3 vs. 10 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment (vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty) of VCFs was associated with sooner pain relief without an increased risk of new or adjacent fractures. Moreover, the progression of treated fractures was significantly lower in the surgical cohort. The only unfavorable aspect was the more extended hospital stay compared with the conservative treatment group.